Utah's New App Store Law: A Win for Meta, a Headache for Tech Giants

Utah’s New Age Verification Law: A Win for Meta, a Headache for Tech Giants

Utah just passed a groundbreaking bill that shifts the responsibility of verifying users’ ages onto app stores. This move aligns with what Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg suggested last year—placing the burden on app stores instead of individual platforms. Now, the bill awaits Governor Spencer Cox’s signature.

If signed into law, the legislation will require app stores to verify a user’s age and obtain parental consent before allowing minors to download apps. This approach aims to streamline parental oversight and protect young users from harmful content. At least eight other states are considering similar measures, potentially setting a precedent for nationwide changes in digital regulation.

The Debate Over Privacy and Responsibility

While Meta, Snap, and X (formerly Twitter) support the bill, Apple and Google strongly oppose it. These tech giants argue that the law compromises user privacy and raises constitutional concerns.

Apple warns that users—regardless of age—would need to share sensitive personal information, such as a government-issued ID or facial scan, to verify their age. The company argues that this level of data collection is excessive and unnecessary for apps that do not require age restrictions. Google echoes similar concerns, stating that the law introduces privacy risks without effectively addressing online safety issues.

Both Apple and Google propose a shared responsibility model, where app developers and app stores collaborate on age verification while limiting data sharing. Google has even requested that the Utah governor veto the bill, offering alternative legislative text in its place.

A One-Stop-Shop for Age Verification?

Supporters of the bill believe it simplifies age verification for parents. Instead of verifying their child’s age across multiple platforms, they would only need to do so once through the app store. This method could also prevent minors from bypassing platform-specific safety features by misrepresenting their birthdate.

The law categorizes users into four groups: under 13 (“child”), 13-16 (“young teenager”), 16-18 (“older teenager”), and 18+ (“adult”). It mandates that a minor’s account be linked to a parent’s, ensuring parental approval for app downloads and in-app purchases. If the bill becomes law, enforcement will begin next year.

Unanswered Questions and Potential Challenges

Despite its intentions, the bill raises complex legal and practical concerns. What happens when a device is shared by both adults and minors? How will app stores enforce these rules for users who travel or use VPNs to mask their location?

Privacy remains a central issue. Even though the law aims to limit data sharing across multiple platforms, app stores would still collect and store personal information. This requirement extends beyond children to all users, raising concerns about data security and digital freedom.

Another challenge is the potential for age verification technology to misclassify users. Facial recognition and AI-based tools could mistakenly flag adults as minors or vice versa, leading to accessibility issues and unnecessary restrictions.

Additionally, legal experts caution that this law may face First Amendment challenges. Requiring users to verify their age before accessing online content could be seen as restricting access to legally protected speech. A similar Utah law requiring social media age verification was previously blocked in court for this reason.

The Bigger Picture

Even if the bill passes, it won’t absolve platforms like Meta from their responsibility to protect young users. Developers may also need to reassess their compliance with child privacy laws, such as the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), to avoid potential violations.

Despite concerns, many parents and policymakers believe action is necessary to address online risks for children. Lawmakers are working with available tools to enhance digital safety. But will shifting responsibility to app stores truly solve the issue, or will it create new complications for tech companies and users alike?

‍